The nation's home loan companies have been battling deteriorating housing market conditions for some time now and that has caused severe losses for many of them. Property values are dropping in several areas and borrowers in these markets increasingly face the threat of foreclosure as their exotic ARMs reset higher and make payments unmanageable. Times are tough on both sides of the fence, to say the least.
In an effort to stem the bleeding, mortgage firms have instituted a bunch of new policies, one of which has drawn pretty heavy criticism from consumer advocacy groups and some in the lending industry itself. They call it new "redlining". It all started when Fannie Mae in December announced that from mid-January on it would require an extra 5% down payment from loans originated in declining areas. A declining, or high-risk, area could be an entire county, a metropolitan area or a zip code. Since last summer Fannie Mae has been labeling certain areas as declining and now it urged banks to use practically any available statistics to do their own risk assessments. Several national lenders have followed that advice and promptly stirred up the controversy.
What the critics are saying is that to paint a whole county, for instance, high-risk is simply overdoing it. Las Vegas is in Clark County, let's take it as an example, and admittedly overall real estate here is challenged, but there are multiple neighborhoods in the county where home values are stable or even climbing some. To punish everyone across the board just doesn't add up. Homeowners and the mortgage trade would be better served if a mortgage application was judged by diligent underwriting instead of where its location is. That's the way it should be.
Furthermore, it seems that these declining market tags lean harder on areas with large minority and moderate income buyers, some critics claim. Many of them were able to get a mortgage a few years back when stated and low- and no-down payment loan programs were all the rage. Now they can't sell because buyers eager to purchase are unable to qualify, their homes could go into foreclosure and then the area's property values sink further and that, at the end, hurts the banks, too, when they get undervalued repos in their books.
The alleged modern "redlining" could've been designed with more foresight.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Provided by:
Esko Kiuru
Mortgage and real estate market commentator
www.BluefoxToday.com - syndicated mortgage and real estate blog
eskokiuru@gmail.com
My cell: 702-499-1006
Larry,
Looks like Fannie Mae just overreacted.
Esko, this move by Fannie & Freddie did not make any sense to me when I first saw it and it still doesn't make any sense. House should be appraised the same across the board. If values have gone down then it should be appraised at its reduced present value, and the same if it goes up. But to automatically assume and penalize a Buyer by assuming that the property values are going to continue to go down is wrong as well as manufacturing a self full filling prophecy.
Esko,
Sounds like Fannie and Freddie need to do some damage control of their image.
George,
Fannie and Freddie made a hasty decision that they probably now regret.
Fran,
Both agencies have had some issues lately, besides this.
I love the following comment:
"Many of them were able to get a mortgage a few years back when stated and low- and no-down payment loan programs were all the rage.
That was a very good way to put it!
D. Bass,
Those were the days.
Rich,
They were probably pressured from many directions to act and they did without due consideration.